2018 sees Mark Zuckerberg new. The 4-year-old CEO and co-founder of Facebook, the world’s largest social media platform, has decided to stick to the wheel of Facebook.
In late March, Zuckerberg announced that he would testify before Congress in the wake of the Cambridge Analytica scandal, which revealed data on Facebook’s ৮ 87 million users.
His approval to meet with the US Congress also reveals that the leadership has suggested that the Russian Internet research firm succeeded in using American citizens to implant false information before the 2016 presidential election using Facebook.
In that 3-year history, Facebook has become a technology-driven baby poster, breaking democracy together and moving into populist societies like India and China.
Of course, this led to an intense protest and forced regulators around the world to take the flag.
One day later it became clear that Facebook was no longer just a social community. He has the power to make peace or break it. And it’s not easy to control.
During the two-hour-long congressional hearing, Zuckerberg removed himself from a young software developer to a business professional that lawmakers wanted to retain.
He took a page from the book of US President 44 Barack Obama and wore a navy suit, white shirt and light blue shirt. He was calm and apologetic about what happened on the platform.
Facebook is an optimistic and optimistic company বেশিরভাগ For most of our existence we have focused on how we can communicate with all the good people.
Speaking for the first time in the US Senate, Zuckerberg said that with the development of Facebook, people everywhere have become a powerful new tool for keeping in touch with their favorite people, listening to their voices and establishing society and business.
During two days of testimony before the Senate and the US House of Representatives, Zuckerberg expressed his passion for Facebook and the way he would connect people around the world to make the world a better place.
Zuckerberg also spoke a long time about how Facebook works and what its $ 40 million income source is.
There was plenty of fast food on two days when Zuckerberg removed his traditional teahouse suit from the suite and laughed at the people who had the ability to decorate the platform:
On the first day of testimony before the Senate, the word AI was mentioned 25 times, when it was used nine times when testifying before the Zuckerberg House Committee on April 11. Platform last year.
However, this particular belief did not come up with supporting phrases, and Facebook itself did not shed light on how and where Amnesty International was published, regardless of how it was actively used to reduce hate speech and the content of terrorism.
This really leads us to the big question: can Amnesty International really save Facebook?
Before we answer this question, it is important to review a few exchanges between Zuckerberg and the senators during the two-day testimony we received.
Senator John Thune: As we discussed in my office yesterday, it can sometimes be difficult to identify the dividing line between legitimate political speech and hate speech, especially when it relies on artificial intelligence and other techniques for early discovery.
Can you discuss the steps that Facebook is taking when making these assessments, the challenges you face, and the examples you draw the line between and what you hate?
Zuckerberg: Yes, Mr. President. I’ll talk about hate speech, and then I’ll talk about applying broad content policies. So – actually, maybe, if – you’re right, we’ll move on.
So, after the company was started in 28 – I started in my bedroom; Me and my roommate were in the room.
We didn’t have any AI technology that could see the content people shared. So – so we had to apply our content policies interactively.
As you know, six months ago, I asked your general counsel about the role of Facebook as a fertile background for hate speech against Rohingya refugees.
Recently, UN investigators have blamed Facebook for playing a role in inciting a possible genocide in Myanmar. And there was genocide. You say you use artificial intelligence to find it. It’s the kind of content I’m referring to.
Now, this threat has gone straight through your detection systems, spread very quickly, and then after another attempt to engage civil society groups, you should try to remove it.
إرسال تعليق